Fraud & Corruption
Related-Party Conflict Network Analysis
Related-party network analysis links officials, bidders and directors across data sources to expose conflicts of interest that no single record reveals.
Why Conflict Network Analysis Matters
The most damaging conflicts of interest are the ones nobody declared, hidden behind relatives, directorships and shared addresses that no single record reveals. Spotting them requires connecting officials, bidders and company directors across data sources — the analysis that the SCM framework, King IV and PRECCA all implicitly demand but that manual review rarely achieves. AuditPro Core builds the related-party network so hidden links between those who decide and those who win surface as testable conflicts.
The Numbers
AuditPro Core renders this view from your tenant's live, tamper-evident records. The figures below are illustrative sample data.
Conflict links found
2 480
▲ 19%
Officials in network
640
Award value affected
R3.1 bn
Undeclared interests
418
Conflict links by relationship
Largest conflict clusters
| Cluster | Officials | Awards (R m) |
|---|---|---|
| Cluster 1 (infrastructure) | 41 | 980 |
| Cluster 2 (consulting) | 33 | 720 |
| Cluster 3 (catering / events) | 28 | 540 |
| Cluster 4 (security) | 22 | 410 |
Figures shown are illustrative sample data for demonstration. AuditPro Core renders these views from your own tenant's live, tamper-evident records.
The Hidden Conflict
A conflict is hidden when the connection between a decision-maker and a beneficiary is not declared and not obvious. It typically routes through a relative, a co-director or a shared address.
Network Linkage
Network analysis joins identity numbers, directorships, addresses and banking across datasets to reveal relationships. A link invisible in any one record becomes clear once the data is connected.
Officials to Bidders
The conflicts that matter most connect those who influence an award to those who receive it. The network ranks links by proximity to the decision, not just by existence.
Link to Verdict
A network link is a hypothesis to investigate, not proof of corruption. It directs enquiry toward relationships that, once confirmed and undeclared, become disciplinary or criminal matters.
How AuditPro Core Bridges the Gap
- Network construction: AuditPro Core joins official, bidder and CIPC director data to map relationships no single record shows.
- Proximity ranking: links closest to award decisions are prioritised over distant or incidental connections.
- Exception workflow: high-risk conflicts route to investigation and declaration verification.
- Traceability to source: every link decomposes to the shared data point that established it, defensibly under POPIA.
Key Takeaways
- The worst conflicts are the undeclared ones hidden across records.
- Network linkage reveals relationships invisible in any single dataset.
- Prioritise links closest to the award decision.
- Treat a link as a hypothesis to test, not a verdict.
See This on Your Own Data
AuditPro Core renders this dashboard from your tenant's live, tamper-evident records — every figure traceable to source.