Infrastructure Projects
Contractor Performance Ratings
Delivery, quality and timeliness scores for contractors on active infrastructure projects.
Why contractor ratings protect delivery
Infrastructure delivery depends on contractors, and systematic ratings of their delivery, quality and timeliness protect both projects in progress and future procurement decisions. Objective performance records support the CIDB framework, defend the municipality in disputes and feed responsible supplier database management under the MFMA SCM regulations. AuditPro Core captures structured contractor ratings tied to project evidence so procurement and project decisions rest on facts, not impressions.
The Numbers
AuditPro Core renders this view from your tenant's live, tamper-evident records. The figures below are illustrative sample data.
Contractors Rated
42
Underperforming
9
score < 60
Avg Score
71
out of 100
Penalties Issued
6
this quarter
Average score by category
Lowest-rated contractors
| Contractor | Project | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Sizwe Civils | Ring Road | 48 |
| Bopha Build | Clinic Ext | 53 |
| Mzansi Plant | Bulk Sewer | 57 |
Figures shown are illustrative sample data for demonstration. AuditPro Core renders these views from your own tenant's live, tamper-evident records.
Multi-dimensional rating
Contractor performance is more than schedule, spanning quality of work, timeliness, safety and contract compliance. Rating each dimension separately gives a fair and actionable picture.
Evidence-based scoring
Ratings must rest on inspection reports, snag lists and milestone records rather than subjective opinion. Defensible scores are essential if used in future tender evaluation or disputes.
Feedback to procurement
Past performance is a legitimate consideration in supplier management and award decisions. A reliable rating history helps avoid re-appointing chronic under-performers.
Early intervention
Declining ratings on an active project are an early warning to intervene before delays and defects compound. The rating is a management tool, not only a record.
How AuditPro Core Bridges the Gap
- Structured scorecards: AuditPro Core records delivery, quality and timeliness scores against defined criteria per contractor.
- Evidence linkage: each score ties to inspection and milestone records for defensibility.
- Trend monitoring: declining performance on active projects is flagged for intervention.
- Procurement export: rating histories export to inform supplier management and award decisions.
Key Takeaways
- Rate contractors across delivery, quality, timeliness and compliance.
- Anchor every score in inspection and milestone evidence.
- Feed performance history into future procurement decisions.
- Use declining ratings to intervene early on active projects.
See This on Your Own Data
AuditPro Core renders this dashboard from your tenant's live, tamper-evident records — every figure traceable to source.