Service Delivery
Road Resealing vs Annual Plan
Resealing kilometres delivered against the annual programme is a clear, countable measure of whether the road network is being maintained or quietly allowed to decay.
Why Resealing Progress Matters
The annual surfacing programme sets a resealing target in the SDBIP, and kilometres delivered against it is a service-delivery indicator in the annual performance report. Persistent under-delivery accelerates the deterioration of the road asset base and inflates the future renewal backlog. AuditPro Core compares kilometres resealed against the planned programme so delivery shortfalls are visible before the network condition reflects them.
The Numbers
AuditPro Core renders this view from your tenant's live, tamper-evident records. The figures below are illustrative sample data.
Planned (km)
180
Resealed (km)
118
66%
Behind plan (km)
62
34%
Spend used
R 71 m
of R 96 m
Cumulative km resealed vs plan
Resealing by region
| Region | Planned km | Actual km |
|---|---|---|
| Northern | 60 | 44 |
| Eastern | 55 | 31 |
| Western | 65 | 43 |
Figures shown are illustrative sample data for demonstration. AuditPro Core renders these views from your own tenant's live, tamper-evident records.
Reseal as Preventive Maintenance
Resealing extends pavement life at a fraction of the cost of reconstruction. Falling behind the programme is not cosmetic; it converts cheap maintenance into expensive future rehabilitation.
Planned Versus Delivered
Reported achievement must compare actual kilometres resealed against the planned programme target. Counting kilometres scoped but not completed overstates delivery.
Evidence and Verification
Each kilometre claimed should trace to completion certificates and location records. Auditors test whether the work claimed actually occurred where and to the extent reported.
How AuditPro Core Bridges the Gap
- Plan comparison: kilometres resealed are measured against the annual surfacing programme target.
- Exception workflow: programme shortfalls are flagged for explanation and re-planning.
- Traceability to source: claimed kilometres link to completion certificates and location data.
- Audit-ready output: the delivery schedule substantiates the roads service-delivery target.
Key Takeaways
- Resealing is low-cost prevention; deferral inflates future rehabilitation cost.
- Report delivered kilometres, not scoped or in-progress ones.
- Claimed work must trace to completion certificates and locations.
- Tracking against plan exposes shortfalls before the network degrades visibly.
See This on Your Own Data
AuditPro Core renders this dashboard from your tenant's live, tamper-evident records — every figure traceable to source.