Back to Explore
📑

Contract Management

Evergreen & Month-to-Month Contracts

Identifies expired contracts still being paid month-to-month without renewal or retendering.

📖 6 min read🎯 Intermediate✍️ Updated 2026

Why month-to-month payments breach competition

When a contract expires but payments continue month-to-month, the organ of state is procuring without a valid contract and without competition, which is irregular under the MFMA and SCM regulations. These evergreen arrangements deny the market a fresh opportunity and often lock in dated pricing, a frequent AGSA finding. AuditPro Core identifies expired contracts that are still being paid so they are retendered or formally extended.

The Numbers

AuditPro Core renders this view from your tenant's live, tamper-evident records. The figures below are illustrative sample data.

Evergreen Contracts

61

▲ 9

Spend Past Expiry

R 73.4m

YTD

Avg Months Overrun

8.3

▲ 1.6

Retender Underway

17

of 61

Months Past Expiry by Contract Band (count)

Longest-Running Expired Contracts

ContractVendorMonths OverSpend (R'000)
CTR-6201Vendor 03412918640
CTR-6277Vendor 07022112310
CTR-6340Vendor 0988169870
CTR-6418Vendor 1255137420
CTR-6492Vendor 1503115910

Figures shown are illustrative sample data for demonstration. AuditPro Core renders these views from your own tenant's live, tamper-evident records.

Expiry as a hard stop

A contract end date is a legal limit on the mandate to spend. Payments after expiry have no contractual basis and become irregular expenditure unless a valid extension exists.

Evergreen drift

Month-to-month continuation feels convenient but bypasses competition indefinitely. What begins as a short gap routinely runs for years, entrenching a single supplier.

Variation versus new procurement

A lawful extension follows the variation rules and stays within scope and value limits. Open-ended continuation is not a variation; it is unauthorised new procurement.

Retendering discipline

Tracking contract expiry against the procurement plan lets the organ of state retender in good time, avoiding the gap that forces an evergreen arrangement.

How AuditPro Core Bridges the Gap

  • Reconciliation: AuditPro Core matches payments against contract end dates to find spend continuing past expiry.
  • Exception workflow: Expired-but-paid contracts raise cases for retender or formal, rule-compliant extension.
  • Continuous monitoring: Upcoming expiries are flagged ahead of time so retendering starts early.
  • Traceability to source: Each flag links to the contract, its expiry and the post-expiry payments.

Key Takeaways

  • Payments after contract expiry are irregular without a valid extension.
  • Month-to-month continuation indefinitely bypasses competition.
  • Distinguish a lawful variation from unauthorised new procurement.
  • Flag expiries early to retender before a gap forces an evergreen.

See This on Your Own Data

AuditPro Core renders this dashboard from your tenant's live, tamper-evident records — every figure traceable to source.