Procurement Anomaly Detection
Benford, split-PO and vendor-concentration forensics.
Forensic-grade anomaly detection over the SCM-contracts register — Benford's-law goodness-of-fit on contract values, vendor-concentration analysis and split-PO detection around the R 500 000 threshold.
What you get
- Benford's Law
- Split-PO detection
- Vendor concentration
Why it matters
The statistical fingerprints of procurement fraud, surfaced early.
Procurement is where most public-sector corruption lives, and the patterns are statistical. Contract values that don't follow Benford's Law, a single vendor capturing an outsized share of spend, and purchase orders clustered just under the R 500 000 single-quotation threshold to dodge competitive bidding — these are the fingerprints of manipulation, and they are detectable in the data long before a whistleblower comes forward. The Treasury SCM regulations and PRECCA make these patterns matters of irregular expenditure and corruption.
Manual procurement review cannot find them. An auditor eyeballing a contracts register sees individual transactions, not the distribution; a split-PO scheme spread across months is invisible to the human reader; vendor concentration only shows up when someone totals it. So the schemes run for years, the irregular expenditure compounds, and AGSA's SCM review eventually surfaces what analytics could have caught at quarter one.
Forensic-grade anomaly detection runs the statistics over the SCM contracts register continuously — Benford's-law goodness-of-fit on contract values, vendor-concentration analysis, and split-PO detection around the threshold — and each flag carries the math behind it. Saved scans become audit evidence, and flagged patterns feed straight into the forensic case register for investigation.
Capabilities
What Procurement Anomaly Detection does.
Benford's Law
Goodness-of-fit on contract values flags unnatural distributions.
Split-PO detection
Detects sequences clustered under the single-quotation threshold.
Vendor concentration
Surfaces suppliers taking an outsized share of spend.
Outcomes
What changes for your team.
Tangible improvements an entity sees once Procurement Anomaly Detection replaces the spreadsheet.
How it works
From data to defensible signal.
Want to see Procurement Anomaly Detectionrunning on your entity's own data?
Enquire nowWho it's for
- Chief Audit Executive and forensic investigators
- SCM Compliance Officer
- Internal Audit data-analytics team
- AGSA performance-audit team reviewing procurement
Legislative basis
- PPPFA Regulations 2022 — single-quotation threshold R 500 000
- Treasury Regulation 16A6.1 — competitive bidding
- PRECCA 12 of 2004 — corruption and corrupt procurement
- IIA Standard 1220 — data analytics in due professional care
FAQ
Questions teams ask before they sign up.
Can we use the output as audit evidence?
Yes. Saved scans become the audit-evidence record, and each flag carries its underlying statistical test — Benford's-law fit, concentration ratio or split-PO pattern — so the finding is defensible and reproducible.
Does it analyse our procurement data externally?
No. The analytics run over your SCM-contracts register inside your tenant boundary. Nothing leaves your environment.
What happens to a flagged vendor or pattern?
Flagged vendors and split-PO patterns feed directly into the forensic case register, so a statistical signal becomes a tracked investigation rather than a dead-end alert.
Want to know more about Procurement Anomaly Detection?
Tell us about your entity and we'll be in touch with a walkthrough, pricing and next steps — everything you see is traceable to source.
